Mayorkas

Cancino Castellar v. Mayorkas

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20213:17-cv-00491California910 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOSE ORLANDO CANCINO Case No.: 3:17-cv-491-BAS-AHG CASTELLAR, et al.,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

Plaintiffs, JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE v. CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE

ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, et al., 14 Defendants. [ECF No. 184]

16 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Continue Case Management 17 Conference. ECF No. 184. The parties request that the Court extend the October 5 filing 18 deadline for their Joint Case Management Statement, and the October Case 19 Management Conference. Id. 20 Parties seeking to continue deadlines must demonstrate good cause. Chmb.R. at 2– 21 3 (stating that any request for continuance requires “[a] showing of good cause for the 22 request”); see also FED. R. CIV. P. 6(b) (“When an act may or must be done within a 23 specified time, the court may, for good cause, extend the time”). “Good cause” is a non- 24 rigorous standard that has been construed broadly across procedural and statutory contexts. 25…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.