Hammett
Hammett v. Sherman
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAURA LYNN HAMMETT, an Case No.: 19-CV-605 TWR (AHG) individual,
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO
Plaintiff, DISMISS AND DENYING MOTION v. TO CLARIFY ORDER
MARY E. SHERMAN, an individual, et 15 al., (ECF Nos. 162, 164, 166, 167, 215) 16 Defendants. 17 The several Defendants have moved to dismiss Plaintiff Laura Hammett’s Second Amended Complaint. (ECF Nos. 162, 164, 166, 167.) Plaintiff opposes. (ECF No. 194.) In addition, Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Clarify an Order issued by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (ECF No. 215.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motions to dismiss and DENIES the Motion to Clarify Order. BACKGROUND The facts of this case have been recited in a previous order. (See ECF No. 111.) In short, this case stems from a family dispute about the management of Silver Strand Plaza, LLC, a California limited liability corporation. (Second Am.…