Ruotolo

Ruotolo v. Homegoods, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20213:21-cv-01495California899 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VALERIA RUOTOLO, an individual, Case No.: 3:21-cv-01495-AJB-LL

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

Plaintiff, MOTION TO COMPEL v. ARBITRATION

HOMEGOODS, INC., a Delaware (Doc. No. 2) Corporation; THE TJX COMPANIES, INC., a Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10,

Defendants. 19 Before the Court is HomeGoods, Inc. and the TJX Companies, Inc.’s (“Defendants”) motion to compel arbitration in Valeria Ruotolo’s (“Plaintiff”) civil action for alleged labor and employment violations. (Doc. No. 2.) The Court set a briefing schedule for the motion, directing that any opposition be filed by September 13, 2021. (Doc. No. 3.) Plaintiff did not file an opposition or otherwise respond to Defendants’ motion. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), the Court deems this matter suitable for determination without oral argument and hereby VACATES the motion hearing date scheduled for October 7,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.