Frando

Frando v. Gore

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20213:21-cv-01434California848 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL FRANDO, Case No.: 21-cv-01434-JLS-KSC

Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING RENEWED

v. MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL

BILL GORE, et al., [Doc. No. 10] Respondents. 16 Petitioner Daniel Frando (“petitioner”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se on a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See Doc. No. 1. Before the Court is petitioner’s renewed Motion to Appoint Counsel. Doc. No. 10. For the reasons stated below, petitioner’s motion is DENIED. The Court denied petitioner’s previous motion to appoint counsel [Doc. No. 5], finding that he had shown neither that that he was financially unable to obtain representation nor “made an adequate showing that the interests of justice require[d]” that counsel be appointed to assist him. Doc. No. 6 at 2. In the present motion, petitioner asserts that counsel should be appointed to him due to his indigence, his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.