Torres

Torres v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20213:19-cv-01964California1,461 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 EDUARDO TORRES, Case No.: 19-cv-01964-LAB-JLB

Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

v. MISCELLANEOUS MOTIONS

RALPH DIAZ, et al.,

Respondents. [ECF Nos. 60; 63; 64; 65; 67; 69; 71; 17 74; 80; 92] 18

I. INTRODUCTION Petitioner Eduardo Torres (“Petitioner”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis on a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF Nos. 1; 9.) Presently before the Court are multiple miscellaneous motions filed by Petitioner, including: (1) a Motion for Extension of Time and Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 60); (2) Motions for Extension of Time to File (ECF Nos. 63; 64; 65); (3) Motions to Extend Time and Appoint Counsel (ECF No. 67; 69); (4) a Motion for Extension of Time, Request for Incompetence Hearing, and a Request for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 71); (5) a Motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.