Sywula
Sywula v. DaCosta
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20213:21-cv-01450California2,810 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KRZYSZTOF SYWULA, Case No. 21-cv-01450-BAS-AGS
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. (1) DENYING EX PARTE ALEXIS DACOSTA, et al.,
MOTION FOR TEMPORARY
Defendants. RESTRAINING ORDER (ECF No. 9);
(2) DIRECTING DEFENDANTS
TO SHOW CAUSE WHY A
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
SHOULD NOT ISSUE; AND
20 (3) SETTING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE AND HEARING
DATE FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION
25 Pending before this Court is Plaintiff’s ex parte application for a temporary 26 restraining order or, in the alternative, a preliminary injunction. (Mot. for a TRO (“Mot.”), 27 ECF No. 9.) Defendants opposed (Opp’n, ECF No. 14) and Plaintiff replied (Reply, ECF 28 No. 16). The Court finds the Motion for a TRO suitable for determination on the papers and submitted without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). For…