Raiser
Raiser v. The United States District Court for the Southern District of California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON RAISER, Case No.: 20-CV-1490 TWR (AGS)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. RENEWED EX PARTE
APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
RESTRAINING ORDER OR
COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
16 Defendants. (ECF No. 54)
18 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Aaron Riser’s Renewed “Emergency” Ex Parte Application for Order (“Renewed Ex Parte App.,” ECF No. 54). The Court denied Plaintiff’s original Ex Parte Application, ECF No. 52, on the grounds that Plaintiff had failed to establish his entitlement to ex parte relief and therefore directed Plaintiff to file a properly noticed motion. (See ECF No. 53 at 2.) The Court also admonished Plaintiff not to file further ex parte requests unless merited under the very limited circumstances for seeking such relief. (See id. at 2–3.) Rather than comply with the Court’s…