Grano

Grano v. Sodexo, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 12, 20213:18-cv-01818California5,360 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 Case Nos.: 18cv1818-TWR(BLM) VINCENT GRANO, et al.,

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART CARGILL’S MOTION

v. TO COMPEL

SODEXO MANAGEMENT, INC., et al., [ECF Nos. 375, 377] Defendants. ____________________________________

AND RELATED CASES

13 Currently before the Court are letter briefs dated September 29, 2021, from Plaintiffs and Defendant Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. ECF Nos. 377 (“Pl.s’ Mot.”), 375 (“Cargill Mot.”). For the reasons set forth below, Cargill’s request to compel further response from Plaintiffs is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. RELEVANT BACKGROUND On July 19, 2021, Cargill filed a motion in limine to exclude a preliminary CDC report and a related case-control study. ECF No. 337. Plaintiffs opposed the motion on September 21, 2021. ECF No. 364. The exhibits to the opposition include declarations from Amelia Keaton, M.D., Medical…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.