Raiser

Raiser v. San Diego County

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20213:19-cv-00751California948 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON RAISER, Case No.: 19-cv-00751-GPC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING EX PARTE

v. APPLICATION

SAN DIEGO COUNTY, [ECF No. 227] Defendant. 16 Pending before this Court is Plaintiff’s ex parte Application for Order: (1) that Judge Curiel review the audio recording, exhibits, and briefing from Summary Judgment; (2) that Judge Curiel address each item in Plaintiff’s Motions to Reconsider with formal legal analysis; (3) to continue Costs briefing; (4) for Judge Curiel to certify he has read Plaintiff’s application and decided the matter without input from staff; and (5) request to exceed page limit. Plaintiff has again improperly filed an ex parte application requesting relief on issues that this Court has already conclusively decided. Plaintiff had the opportunity to fully brief his arguments at summary judgment, and was further able to fully brief his Motions for Reconsideration. Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.