Baize

Baize v. United States District Court, Southern District of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20213:21-cv-01262California1,773 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEBBIE BAIZE, Case No. 21-cv-01262-BAS-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

v. WITH PREJUDICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF

CALIFORNIA,

16 Defendant.

In response to the Court’s September 20, 2021 order dismissing Plaintiff Debbie Baize’s First Amended Complaint (“Second Dismissal Order”) (ECF No. 17), Plaintiff has filed three documents regarding her claims in this case. (ECF Nos. 19, 20, 22.) The Court construes the first document (ECF No. 19) as a motion to appoint counsel, the third such motion Plaintiff has filed in this action. The Court construes the second document (ECF No. 20) and the third document (ECF No. 22) as a Second Amended Complaint and corrected Second Amended Complaint, respectively. The Court construes the third-filed document as the operative pleading. For the reasons set forth below, the Court (1) DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE this action and (2) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.