Meyer

Meyer v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20213:21-cv-00341California9,591 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM MEYER, an individual; DANA Case No.: 21-cv-00341-GPC GASCAY; an individual,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

Plaintiffs, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTIONS TO DISMISS

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; RADY

COMPLAINT

CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL; ELIZABETH

REESE, an individual; KAYLA [ECF Nos. 31, 32, 34, 35, 36, 56] VALENZUELA, an individual; DR. 17 SHALON NIENOW, an individual; TIFFANY PAUGH, an individual; and DOES 1 through 50 INCLUSIVE, 19 Defendants. 20 Before this Court are Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint 21 (ECF No. 27, “FAC”) filed by Defendant Dr. Shalon Nienow (ECF No. 31), Defendants 22 Rady Children’s Hospital (“Rady”) and Elizabeth Reese (ECF No. 32), Defendants Kayla 23 Valenzuela and Tiffany Paugh (ECF No. 35), and Defendant San Diego County (ECF 24 No. 36). The parties have fully briefed the issue. The Court finds this matter suitable for 25 disposition without oral…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.