Holtz

Holtz v. Powazek

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20213:21-cv-01401California943 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BENJAMIN HOLTZ, Case No.: 21-CV-1401-CAB-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

HARRY L. POWAZEK et al., [Doc. No. 6] Defendants. 16 In this case, Plaintiff Benjamin Holtz sues three San Diego Superior Court judges, one Superior Court commissioner, an executive officer of the Superior Court, and three attorneys who were allegedly involved in family court proceedings involving Plaintiff concerning his divorce and custody rights over his son. The gravamen of the allegations in the operative first amended complaint (“FAC”) is that Plaintiff is unhappy with the outcome of his family court proceedings and the manner in which the Superior Court handled his case. The Superior Court judges (Hon. Lorna Alksne, Hon. Harry L. Powazek, and Hon. Paula Rosenstein), the commissioner (Hon. Patti C. Ratekin), and the executive officer (Michael Roddy) (collectively, the “Superior Court Defendants”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.