S.S.
S.S. v. Peloton Interactive, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff $.8., a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem Eunjin Stern 1/(°S.S."); Eunjin Stern, an individual (“Mrs. Stern”); and William Stern, an individual ||(“Mr. Stern”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this action against Defendant Peloton Interactive, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Defendant” or “Peloton”) for injuries || allegedly sustained in connection with Peloton’s Tread+ treadmill (the “Tread+”). -|-
Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Compe! Arbitration and to Dismiss or
3 || without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)\(1) and Rule 78(b) of the ||Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ECF No. 14. After considering the papers submitted, 5 || supporting documentation, and applicable law, the Court DENIES Peloton’s Motion to ||Compel Arbitration as to Mrs. Stern and §.S. but GRANTS the Motion as to William 7 || Stern only.
BACKGROUND
A. Statement of Facts Peloton is an innovative fitness equipment and media company that combines technology, hardware, and production to bring the immersive experience of fitness…