Diaz

Diaz v. Capital One, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20213:21-cv-00526California5,241 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ISMAEL DIAZ, Case No.: 21cv526-DMS-LL

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING IN PART

v. AND DENYING IN PART

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

CAPITAL ONE, N.A.; CAPITAL ONE

COMPEL AND (2) DENYING

FINANCIAL CORPORATION; and PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR

CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.,

SANCTIONS

16 Defendants.

Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery Responses Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a). ECF No. 22 (“Mot.”). Defendants filed a Response in Opposition [ECF No. 23 (“Opp.”)], and Plaintiff filed a Reply [ECF No. 24 (“Reply”)]. Plaintiff also seeks monetary sanctions for his attorneys’ fees and costs in resolving the discovery dispute and for filing the instant motion. Mot. at 11. For the below reasons, Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. With respect to Plaintiff’s requests for sanctions, the parties may provide supplemental 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.