Diaz
Diaz v. Capital One, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ISMAEL DIAZ, Case No.: 21cv526-DMS-LL
Plaintiff,
ORDER (1) GRANTING IN PART
v. AND DENYING IN PART
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
CAPITAL ONE, N.A.; CAPITAL ONE
COMPEL AND (2) DENYING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION; and PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR
CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.,
SANCTIONS
16 Defendants.
Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery Responses Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a). ECF No. 22 (“Mot.”). Defendants filed a Response in Opposition [ECF No. 23 (“Opp.”)], and Plaintiff filed a Reply [ECF No. 24 (“Reply”)]. Plaintiff also seeks monetary sanctions for his attorneys’ fees and costs in resolving the discovery dispute and for filing the instant motion. Mot. at 11. For the below reasons, Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. With respect to Plaintiff’s requests for sanctions, the parties may provide supplemental 25 …