International Franchise Association v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20213:20-cv-02243California373 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 INTERNATIONAL FRANCHISE Case No. 20-cv-02243-BAS-DEB ASSOCIATION, et al.,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

Plaintiffs, EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR v. LEAVE TO FILE NOTICE OF

SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., (ECF No. 27) Defendants.

17 18 On October 13, 2021, Plaintiffs moved ex parte to file a notice of the following supplemental authorities: Patel v. 7-Eleven, Inc., No. 20-1999, 2021 WL 3486175 (1st Cir. Aug. 9, 2021) and Ranchers Cattlemen Action Legal Fund United Stockgrowers of Am. v. Vilsack, 6 F.4th 983 (9th Cir. July 27, 2021). (ECF No. 27.) Under Civil Local Rule 83.3(g)(2), a party moving ex parte is required to file an affidavit or declaration showing that the party met and conferred with opposing counsel about the intent to file an ex parte motion, made a good faith effort to do so, or should be excused from the meet-and-confer obligation. Once an ex parte…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.