Stanhope

Stanhope v. Co. of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20213:21-cv-01774California803 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 PAUL STANHOPE, Case No.: 3:21-cv-01774-TWR-BLM

CDCR #BA-7742,

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

Plaintiff, ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE vs. FOR FAILING TO PAY

FILING FEE REQUIRED

BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) AND/OR

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,

FAILING TO MOVE TO PROCEED

Defendant. IN FORMA PAUPERIS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)

18 Plaintiff Paul Stanhope, proceeding pro se and a prisoner at California Correctional Institution in Tehachapi, California, has filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See ECF No. 1, “Compl.” I. Failure to Pay Filing Fee or Request IFP Status All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $402. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a).1 An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.