Wiliams

Wiliams v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20213:21-cv-01167California1,688 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TOMMY LEE WILLIAMS, Case No.: 3:21-cv-1167-CAB-WVG

Petitioner,

ORDER: (1) GRANTING

v. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS AND (2)

RAYTHEL FISHER, Warden,

DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED

Respondent. PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE 16 On April 14, 2021, Petitioner, currently detained at Vista Detention Facility (“VDF”) in Vista, California and proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.1 On June 30, 2021, the Court dismissed the case without prejudice because Petitioner failed to satisfy the filing fee requirement, failed to name a proper respondent, and failed to state a cognizable claim. See ECF No. 3. The Court notified Petitioner that to have his case reopened, he must do two things: (1) satisfy 23 24 1 The Petition was originally filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit as an “Application for Leave to File Second or Successive Petition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.