Arellano

Arellano v. Blahnik

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20213:16-cv-02412California816 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAUL ARRELLANO, Case No.: 16cv2412-CAB-DHB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. TRANSCRIPTS,

RECONSIDERATION AND COPIES

BLAHNIK, [Doc. No. 216] Defendant. 16 On October 4, 2021, this Court held an evidentiary hearing regarding whether Plaintiff exhausted his administrative remedies. [Doc. No. 211.] The Court found that Plaintiff did not exhaust his administrative remedies and dismissed the case with prejudice. [Doc. No. 213.] On October 4, 2021, a Clerk’s Judgment was issued in favor of Defendant. [Doc. No. 214.] On October 15, 2021, Plaintiff filed a “Motion (1) to receive transcripts of the evidentiary hearing so I can properly create an effective appeal; (2) I would like to know if I can file a motion for rehearing or reconsideration regarding the outcome of evidentiary hearing or Fed. R. 60(b), (3) copy of these motion. “ [Doc. No. 216]. For the reasons set forth below,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.