Stenson

Stenson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20213:20-cv-01521California1,074 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CAMILLE LYNN STENSON, Case No.: 20-cv-1521-WQH-RBB

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 HAYES, Judge: The matter before the Court is the Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, filed by Plaintiff Camille Lynn Stenson. (ECF No. 22). I. BACKGROUND On August 6, 2020, Plaintiff Camille Lynn Stenson filed a Complaint against the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner denying Plaintiff’s application for Social Security benefits for lack of disability. (ECF No. 1). On June 8, 2021, the parties filed a Joint Motion for Voluntary Remand and Entry of Judgment. (ECF No. 19). On June 11, 2021, the Court issued an Order remanding the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings and directing the Clerk of the Court to enter a final judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against the Commissioner.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.