Raya

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT RAYA, Case No.: 3:19-cv-2295-WQH-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER RESOLVING OPPOSED

JOINT MOTION AND DENYING

v.

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

DAVID BARKA; NOORI BARKA; CONTINUANCE

EVELYN BARKA; CALBIOTECH,

15 INC.; CALBIOTECH, INC. 401(k) [ECF No. 80] PROFIT SHARING PLAN; and

CALBIOTECH, INC. PENSION PLAN,

17 Defendants. 18 Before the Court is the parties’ opposed joint motion to continue the case management deadlines. ECF No. 80. Defendants seek to extend all deadlines by 90 days, or vacate the operative scheduling order until certain pending motions are decided, which Plaintiff opposes. Id. Parties seeking to modify the scheduling order under Rule 16(b) must demonstrate good cause. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent”); ECF No. 59 at 5 (scheduling order, stating that the “dates and times set forth herein will not be modified except for good cause shown”);…