Fahr

Fahr v. City of San Diego, California

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20213:21-cv-01676California9,715 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES FAHR, et al., Case No. 21-cv-01676-BAS-BGS

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

v. APPLICATIONS FOR A

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

ORDER AND PRELIMINARY

Defendants. INJUNCTION (ECF No. 9)

Before this Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order or, in the alternative, a preliminary injunction to enjoin certain provisions of a recently enacted and soon-to-be enforced San Diego City (“City”) Ordinance, which prohibits the possession, purchase, sale, receipt, and transportation of non-serialized firearms and firearm components known as “unfinished frames and unfinished receivers” (“Motion”). (Mot., ECF No. 9; Mem., ECF No. 2.) Plaintiffs say that the Ordinance violates both the “Keep and Bear Arms” Clause of the Second Amendment and the “Takings” Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Defendants opposed (Opp’n, ECF No. 15) and Plaintiffs replied…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.