Gastelum

Gastelum v. HEES II

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20213:21-cv-01337California2,968 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FERNANDO GASTELUM, Case No.: 21-cv-1337 JLS (RBB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER: (1) GRANTING

v. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT

HEES II, d/b/a Big 5 Sporting Goods –

WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR

San Diego, COSTS; AND (2) DISMISSING Defendant. PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)

18 [ECF Nos. 1, 2]

Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Fernando Gastelum’s Complaint (“Compl.,” ECF No. 1) and Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (“IFP Mot.,” ECF No. 2). Having carefully considered Plaintiff’s Complaint, his IFP Motion, and the applicable law, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s IFP Motion and DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Complaint WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IN FORMA PAUPERIS MOTION All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.