Gastelum
Gastelum v. HEES II
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FERNANDO GASTELUM, Case No.: 21-cv-1337 JLS (RBB)
Plaintiff,
ORDER: (1) GRANTING
v. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO
PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT
HEES II, d/b/a Big 5 Sporting Goods –
WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR
San Diego, COSTS; AND (2) DISMISSING Defendant. PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)
18 [ECF Nos. 1, 2]
Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Fernando Gastelum’s Complaint (“Compl.,” ECF No. 1) and Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (“IFP Mot.,” ECF No. 2). Having carefully considered Plaintiff’s Complaint, his IFP Motion, and the applicable law, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s IFP Motion and DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Complaint WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IN FORMA PAUPERIS MOTION All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding…