Reynolds

Reynolds v. Chalmers

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20213:20-cv-02081California1,028 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FERDINAND REYNOLDS, Case No.: 3:20-cv-02081-LAB-AGS

CDCR #D-11772,

ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO

Plaintiff, REINSTATE IN FORMA PAUPERIS vs. STATUS [DKT. 14]

D. CHALMERS,

Defendant. 17 On October 21, 2020, Plaintiff Ferdinand Reynolds, currently incarcerated at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) and proceeding pro se, filed this action seeking damages and injunctive relief for alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12132, and for violations of the Fourteenth Amendment under U.S.C. § 1983. (Dkt. 1, Complaint (“Compl.”)). Reynolds didn’t prepay the $402 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) at the time of filing and instead filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (Dkt. 2). On January 29, 2021, the Court granted Reynolds’s IFP and dismissed the Complaint with leave to amend…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.