Reiner

Reiner v. Cantil-Sakauye

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20213:21-cv-00219California1,661 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARTIN REINER, Case No.: 21-CV-219 DMS (MSB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING RULE

v. MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM

JUDGMENT

TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, CAROL

CORRIGAN, GOODWIN LIU, MING

CHIN, LEONDRA KRUGER,

MARIANO-FLORENTINO CUELLAR,

MANUEL GRAIWER, GARY KAPLAN,

SUSAN KAPLAN, RONNIE CAPLANE,

CRAIG HOLDEN, BRYAN LEIFER,

JOHN BARBER, JOHN HAUBRICH,

JR., CALIFORNIA STATE BAR,

STEVEN YEE, STEVE BELILOVE,

ROSELY GEORGE, JOHN SEGAL,

SUZANNE SEGAL, DENNIS PERLUSS,

SARAH OVERTON, GREGORY

ALARCON, MITCHELL BECKLOFF,

MARK KIM, VIRGINIA PHILLIPS,

STEPHEN WILSON, JONATHAN NISSANOFF, M.D., and DOES 1 through 25 10, inclusive, 26 Defendants.

28 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to set aside the Court’s July 19, 2021 Order Granting Motions to Dismiss, pursuant to Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the following reasons, the motion is denied. I. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.