Veterans Rideshare, Inc. v. Navistar International Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 1, 20213:20-cv-01304California423 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VETERANS RIDESHARE, INC., et al., Case No. 20-cv-01304-BAS-LL

Plaintiffs,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING JOINT MOTION NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL

FOR LEAVE TO FILE

CORPORATION, et al., AMENDED ANSWER (ECF No. Defendants. 30); AND

(2) DIRECTING DEFENDANTS

TO FILE FIRST AMENDED

ANSWER ON THE DOCKET

19 20 On October 28, 2021, this Court denied without prejudice the parties’ joint motion for Defendants to file a First Amended Answer to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint on the ground that the parties’ submission was noncompliant with Local Rule 15.1(b) (ECF No. 27). (Order, ECF No. 28.) The parties filed a renewed motion pursuant to the Order (ECF No. 30), which shows, “through redlining, underlining, [and] strikeouts,” Defendants’ proposed amendments to its operative Answer as required by the local civil rules (First Am. Ans., ECF No. 30-1). In essence, Defendants’ proposed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.