Penny

Penny v. Bastuba

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20213:21-cv-00630California2,013 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RANDY WESLEY PENNY, Case No.: 21-CV-630 TWR (BLM)

CDCR #AR-6440,

ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED

Plaintiff, COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO vs. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) AND 14 1915A(b)(1)

15 MARTIN D. BASTUBA, (ECF No. 8) 16 Defendant. 17 On April 9, 2021, Plaintiff Randy Wesley Penny, currently incarcerated at the Substance Abuse Treatment Facility (“SATF”) located in Corcoran, California, and proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 naming Martin Bastuba, M.D. and Ralph Diaz as Defendants. (See generally ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”). Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); instead, he filed a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (See generally ECF No. 2 (“IFP Mot.”).) 25 26 1 Although Plaintiff states the events he alleges took place while he was at the Substance Abuse Treatment Facility (“SATF”) located…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.