Valles

Valles v. Allison

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20213:21-cv-00819California2,709 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 Case No.: 21-CV-819-GPC-WVG ANDREW VALLES,

R E P O R T A N D Petitioner, RECOMMENDATION ON

PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR

v. STAY AND ABEYANCE KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary, [Doc. Nos. 5 and 8] 17 Respondent. 19 I. INTRODUCTION This Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable Gonzalo P. Curiel, United States District Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636(b)(1) and Local Civil Rule 72.1(d). On April 26, 2021, Andrew Valles (“Petitioner”), a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”) before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 2254. (Doc. No. 1). On June 8, 2021, and July 19, 2021, Petitioner respectively filed the instant Motion for Stay and Abeyance and a Supplemental Motion for Stay and Abeyance (“Motions”) pursuant to Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.