Perez

Perez v. Royal Property Management

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 1, 20213:21-cv-01844California907 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AGUSTIN MUÑOZ PEREZ, Case No.: 21-cv-1844-CAB-WVG

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. 1) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION AS

FRIVOLOUS AND FOR FAILING

ROYAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT,

TO STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT

Defendant. TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii);

AND

17 2) DENYING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

AS MOOT [Doc. No. 2]

21 Plaintiff Agustin Muñoz Perez filed this civil action against Royal Property 22 Management on October 29, 2021. [Doc. No. 1.] Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing 23 fees required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) at the time of filing; instead, he has filed a Motion to 24 Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). [Doc. No. 2.]

I. Screening Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

26 A complaint filed by any person seeking to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 27 1915(a) is subject to sua sponte dismissal if it is “frivolous, malicious,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.