Perez
Perez v. Royal Property Management
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 1, 20213:21-cv-01844California907 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AGUSTIN MUÑOZ PEREZ, Case No.: 21-cv-1844-CAB-WVG
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. 1) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION AS
FRIVOLOUS AND FOR FAILING
ROYAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT,
TO STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT
Defendant. TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii);
AND
17 2) DENYING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
AS MOOT [Doc. No. 2]
21 Plaintiff Agustin Muñoz Perez filed this civil action against Royal Property 22 Management on October 29, 2021. [Doc. No. 1.] Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing 23 fees required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) at the time of filing; instead, he has filed a Motion to 24 Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). [Doc. No. 2.]
I. Screening Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
26 A complaint filed by any person seeking to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 27 1915(a) is subject to sua sponte dismissal if it is “frivolous, malicious,…