Buchheim

Buchheim v. Fenton

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 5, 20213:21-cv-00766California287 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 BUCHHEIM, et al., Case No.: 3:21-cv-766-L-BGS

Plaintiffs,

v.

ORDER ON MOTION TO SEAL

12 FENTON, et al., (ECF 2) Defendants. 14 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to seal portions of their complaint. (ECF 2). The complaint (ECF 1) contains redacted paragraphs. Plaintiffs obtained the redacted information from Nominal Defendant AnaptysBio pursuant to an inspection request under Delaware law. See 8 Del. C. § 220. They were required to sign confidentiality agreements prior to obtaining the records. (ECF 2). The redacted information contains non-public material from board of director meetings, including proprietary information about AnaptysBio’s products, development, commercial processes, scientific data and analyses, and strategies. Id. The disclosure of the information could harm AnaptysBio’s competitive position. Id. And there are no alternatives that would protect that compelling interest. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.