Dioquino

Dioquino v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 5, 20213:20-cv-00167California8,370 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 JONI DIOQUINO, Case No. 20-cv-00167-BAS-RBB 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

v.

UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

15 Defendant.

Plaintiff Joni Dioquino brings this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). She seeks short-term disability (“STD”) and long-term disability (“LTD”) benefits under two employee benefit plans funded by Defendant United of Omaha Life Insurance Company. United filed an Administrative Record (ECF No. 45), and the parties filed opening and responding cross-trial briefs (ECF Nos. 46–48, 52). Each party also filed an objection and a response concerning what material the Court may consider at trial. (ECF Nos. 53, 55, 57–58.) The Court then held a bench trial. (ECF No. 59.) After evaluating the evidence and considering the oral argument of counsel, the Court resolves the parties’ objections and renders the findings of fact and conclusions of 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.