Kajjy

Munoz Perez v. Kajjy

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 20213:21-cv-01848California1,814 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AGUSTIN PEREZ, Case No. 21-cv-1848-BAS-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DISMISSING ACTION RANCHO POINT APARTMENTS INC.,

WITHOUT PREJUDICE (ECF

et al., No. 1); AND Defendants. 16 (2) DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (ECF No. 2)

20 Before the Court is Plaintiff Agustin Perez’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma 21 Pauperis (“IFP Motion”). (ECF No. 2.) In light of the absence of pertinent information in 22 that Motion, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s request. Furthermore, upon an initial pre- 23 answer screening of Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the Court 24 DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE this action. (ECF No. 1.) 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 I. IFP MOTION Plaintiff Agustin Perez filed this action, pro se, on November 1, 2021, against Defendants Rancho Point Apartments Inc. and Mazin Kajjy. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, a litigant who,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.