Dorado

Dorado v. Crumb

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20213:20-cv-01936California628 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL DORADO, Case No.: 3:20-cv-1936-JAH-LL

CDCR #BN-7728,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

Plaintiff, DOCUMENTS TO BE PLACED IN vs. CLOSED FILE AND GRANTING

MOTION FOR CONFIRMATION

CATHERINE CRUMB, et al., OF COURT’S ORDER Defendants. [ECF No. 33] 16 17 18 19 20 I. Procedural History Daniel Dorado, (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at Pleasant Valley State Prison located in Coalinga, California is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. On September 24, 2021, this Court DISMISSED Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint as frivolous, for failing to state a claim, and for seeking money damages against immune defendants pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) and 1915A. (ECF No. 33.) Because the Court found that providing 28 leave to amend would be futile, judgment was entered and the file was closed. (See id. at 9-10.)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.