Rodriguez

Rodriguez v. Gore

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20213:21-cv-01787California1,699 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PEDRO RODRIGUEZ, Case No.: 3:21-cv-1787-CAB-JLB

Petitioner,

ORDER: (1) GRANTING

v. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS AND

WILLIAM GORE, Sheriff, (2) DISMISSING PETITION Respondent. WITHOUT PREJUDICE 16 On October 18, 2021, Petitioner, proceeding pro se, submitted a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, along with a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. ECF Nos. 1, 2. In its October 20, 2021 Order, the Court denied Petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed this case without prejudice because Petitioner failed to provide a copy of this prison trust account statement. ECF No. 3, citing Rule 3(a)(2), 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254; Local Rule 3.2. Petitioner was instructed that to have this case reopened he had to either pay the filing fee or provide adequate proof of his inability to pay no later than December 21, 2021. See id. On November 10, 2021,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.