Keating

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEATING et al., Case No.: 3:15-cv-57-L-AGS

Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER ON MOTION TO ALTER

OR AMEND JUDGMENT (DOC. NO.

14 JASTREMSKI et al., 487 AND 490). Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is Counter-Defendant Dalton’s motion to alter or amend the default judgment. (Doc. No. 487). Counter-Defendant Silvers sought to join the motion. (Doc. No. 490). Counterclaimant The Retirement Group LLC (“TRG”) opposed. (Doc. Nos. 491-492). Counter-Defendants responded. (Doc. No. 496). The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted without oral argument. See Civ. L. R. 7.1. For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES the motion. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) allows courts to reconsider or amend prior orders. The relief sought under that Rule is “an extraordinary remedy.” Enters. v. Estate of Bishop, 229 F.3d 877, 890 (9th Cir. 2000) (internal quotation marks and citation 26 …