Ortiz

Ortiz v. Walmart, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20213:20-cv-02219California530 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

BACKGROUND

21 On May 28, 2020, Plaintiff Rebecca Ortiz (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint in San 22 Diego Superior Court against Defendant Walmart, Inc. alleging negligence and premises 23 liability for injuries she allegedly sustained while shopping at Defendant’s store located 24 at 2540 Rockwood Avenue in Calexico, California. (Dkt. No. 1-2, Compl.) On 25 November 13, 2020, Defendant removed this action to this Court. (Dkt. No. 1.) On April 26 26, 2021, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint. 27 (Dkt. No. 17.) Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”) against Defendant Walmart, Inc., Cesar Rico (“Rico”), and Julio Galvan (“Galvan”). (Dkt. No. 18.) Defendants Walmart and Rico filed their answers. (Dkt. Nos. 25, 33.) Defendant Gavan filed a motion to dismiss the FAC against him because he was not timely served. (Dkt. No. 34.) No opposition was filed. DISCUSSION Civil Local Rule 7.1.e.2. requires a “party opposing a motion to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition within fourteen calendar days of the noticed hearing. Failure to comply with these rules “may…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.