Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company v. Yuma County Water Users Association

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 20213:21-cv-00078California1,186 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATIONWIDE AGRIBUSINESS Case No.: 21-CV-78 JLS (AGS) INSURANCE COMPANY; and

D’ARRIGO BROS. CO. OF ORDER (1) GRANTING

CALIFORNIA, DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND

Plaintiffs,

AMENDED COMPLAINT; AND (2)

v. DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS’

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

YUMA COUNTY WATER USERS

WITH PREJUDICE

ASSOCIATION; and DOES 1 through 10, 17 Inclusive, (ECF No. 17) 18 Defendants.

Presently before the Court is Defendant Yuma County Water Users Association’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (“Mot.,” ECF No. 17). Plaintiffs Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company and D’Arrigo Bros. Co. of California did not file an opposition to the Motion. The Court took the matter under submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). See ECF No. 19. Having carefully reviewed Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (“SAC,” ECF No. 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.