Rosenthal

Rosenthal v. Newsome

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20213:21-cv-01356California424 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TROY ALLAN ROSENTHAL, Case No. 21-cv-1356-MMA (BLM)

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

Plaintiff, ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE vs. A CLAIM AND FOR FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE IN COMPLIANCE

GAVIN NEWSOME, et al., WITH COURT ORDER Defendants. 16 17 On July 23, 2021, Troy Allan Rosenthal (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, was housed at Vista Detention Facility and filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in this Court. See Doc. No. 1. Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); instead, he filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Doc. No. 2. The Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and dismissed Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). Doc. No. 4. The Court granted Plaintiff forty-five (45) days from the date of the dismissal Order to file a First…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.