Hoagland
Hoagland v. Axos Bank
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNETH HOAGLAND, individually Case No.: 20-cv-807-BAS-DEB and on behalf of all others similarly 12 situated, ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AGREED Plaintiff,
AT&T PRODUCTION ORDER
14 v. [DKT. NO. 57] AND ENTERING PRODUCTION ORDER
AXOS BANK,
16 Defendant. 17 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Entry of Agreed AT&T Production Order. Dkt. No. 57. Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the Motion and enters the Stipulated Order to Compel Document Production as follows: Plaintiff Hoagland and non-party AT&T Inc. (“AT&T”) stipulate as follows: 1. On July 26, 2021, Plaintiff served a subpoena on AT&T (the “Subpoena”). Ancillary to the Subpoena, Plaintiff also provided AT&T with a list of 6,830 calls (“Schedule A”), and asked AT&T to provide subscriber and user information for each phone number on the date identified.…