Witt

Witt v. Bristol Farms

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 20213:21-cv-00411California4,597 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SALIMA WITT, Case No. 21-cv-00411-BAS-AGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

v. THE REGENTS OF THE

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA’S

BRISTOL FARMS, et al.,

MOTION TO DISMISS

Defendants. (ECF No. 3)

17 18 Plaintiff Salima Witt (“Witt”) commenced this action against Defendants Bristol Farms, UC San Diego Health, and University of California Health. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) UC San Diego Health and University of California Health, proceeding as Regents of the University of California (“RUC Defendants”), operated the Jacobs Medical Center and instituted a mandatory mask policy to prevent the spread of COVID-19, under which Witt was required to wear a mask in order to complete her cancer screening examination. Witt seeks injunctive relief ordering RUC Defendants to modify their COVID-19 policy to accommodate persons with respiratory and breathing disabilities by allowing them to enter the Jacobs Medical…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.