Amend

Amend v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20213:20-cv-01566California5,076 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PETE A., Case No.: 20cv1566-LL

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting [ECF Nos. 21, 22] Commissioner of Social Security,1 15 Defendant. 16

Plaintiff Pete A. brings this action for judicial review of the Social Security Administration Commissioner’s denial of his claim for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. ECF No. 1. Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 21 (“Pl. Mot.”)], Defendant’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion [ECF No. 22 (“Def. Mot.”)], and Plaintiff’s Reply [ECF No. 23 (“Reply”)]. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 26 27 28 PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On May 18, 2017 and June 26, 2017, Plaintiff filed applications for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.