Ramirez

Ramirez v. Miranda

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20213:20-cv-02280California2,305 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAMUEL “SOFIA” J. RAMIREZ, Case No.: 3:20-cv-02280-DMS-AHG Plaintiff, REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION REGARDING

v.

MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT

A. MIRANDA, et al., [ECF No. 24] Defendants. 17 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to file an Amended Complaint (“Motion to Amend”) (ECF No. 24), which is before the undersigned for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). For the reasons that follow, the undersigned recommends the Court DENY the motion without prejudice and allow Plaintiff leave to submit a renewed Motion to Amend with a complete version of her proposed First Amended Complaint for the Court’s consideration. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”), filed her original Complaint in this matter on November 20, 2020, bringing constitutional claims against Defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 based on events that Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.