Estate of Oral W. Nunis, Sr. v. City of Chula Vista

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20213:21-cv-01627California1,648 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ESTATE OF ORAL W. NUNIS, SR. by Case No.: 21-cv-1627-AJB-DEB and through, ROXIE A. NUNIS, 12 individually and as successor in interest ORDER: to the ESTATE, et al., (1) DENYING MOTION TO 14 Plaintiffs, REMAND 15 v. (2) DENYING AS MOOT EX PARTE

MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR

CITY OF CHULA VISTA, et al., MOTION HEARING

18 Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 8, 11) 19 20 Before the Court is a motion to remand filed by Plaintiffs, Estate of Oral W. Nunis, Sr., by and through Roxie A. Nunis, individually and as successor in interest to the Estate; Naomi Nunis; Willie Mae Kirkland as Guardian ad Litem for Abigail Tabitha Nunis; and Jabez Caleb Nunis (“Estate Plaintiffs”). (Doc. No. 8.) Defendants, City of Chula Vista, Evan Linney, Manuel Padilla, David Rivers, Brian Olson, Jordan Salvador, David Arce, Denny Kremer, and Kenneth Hicks (collectively “Defendants”) filed an opposition, to which the Estate Plaintiffs replied. (Doc. Nos. 12, 15.) Having reviewed the parties’ moving …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.