Navarro

Williams v. Navarro

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20213:18-cv-01318-DMS-BGSCalifornia4,090 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

.

5 3 4 ||

□

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 || LANCE WILLIAMS, Case No.: 3:18-cv-01318-DMS-RBM

CDCR #AG-2394,

Plaintiff, RE OLLOWING IN CAMERA

|] O. NAVARRO, et al.,

Defendants.|_ [Doc. 94]

17 I. INTRODUCTION On May 25, 2021, Lance Williams (“Plaintiff”), a prisoner proceeding pro se and in ||forma pauperis, filed a motion to compel requesting discovery (“Motion”) from ||Defendants C. Bagnol, E. Estrada, N. Garsilaso, R. Katyal, S. Krittman, F. Lewis, O. Navarro, and C. Tiscornia (collectively, “Defendants”)!, which was accepted nunc pro tunc ||to May 20, 2021. (Doc. 94.) Plaintiff sought to compel the production of documents 24 || responsive to Plaintiff's Request for Production of Documents, Set One (“RFP”), including 25 || RFP No. 7 which requested third-party inmate grievances and/or complaints against each 26 27 ' These are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.