Ramirez

Ramirez v. Gutierrez

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 22, 20213:20-cv-01109California2,839 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 Case No.: 20-cv-1109-MMA(BLM) ALIVER RAMIREZ,

Plaintiff, ORDER FOLLOWING IN CAMERA

REVIEW

v.

R. GUTIERREZ, et al., Defendants. 17 On June 29, 2021, Plaintiff submitted a motion to compel discovery that was received by the Court on July 13, 2021 and accepted on discrepancy on July 19, 2021. ECF Nos. 31 & 32. Defendants opposed the motion on August 17, 2021. ECF No. 40. Plaintiff replied on September 30, 2021. ECF No. 44. On October 12, 2021, the Court issued an Order Granting In Part and Denying In Part Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel. ECF No. 45. In the order, the Court found that with respect to Plaintiff’s request to compel further response to Request for Production (“RFP”) Nos. 4 and 6, Defendants satisfied the threshold requirement for application of the Official Information Privilege. See Id. at 15. The Court ordered Defendants to lodge unredacted copies of the memoranda dated August 12, 2020, November 9,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.