Doe

Doe v. San Diego Unified School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20213:21-cv-01809California4,102 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN DOE et al., Case No.: 21-CV-1809-CAB-LL

Plaintiffs,

ORDER VACATING HEARING AND

v. DENYING APPLICATION FOR

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

SAN DIEGO UNIFIED SCHOOL

ORDER

DISTRICT et al., 15 Defendants. [Doc. No. 7] 16 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ application for a temporary restraining order. The application has been fully briefed, and a hearing is currently on calendar for November 19, 2021. Upon review of the briefs, however, the Court deems the application suitable for submission without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing is VACATED, and for the reasons set forth below, the application is DENIED. I. Background A. SDUSD’s Vaccination Roadmap On September 28, 2021, Defendant San Diego Unified School District (“SDUSD”) adopted, via a document called a Vaccination Roadmap, a requirement that all students eligible for a fully FDA approved COVID-19 vaccine receive all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.