Young

Young v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 29, 20213:20-cv-02441California3,347 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOE M. YOUNG, Case No.: 20-cv-02441-H-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS

v. FICKETT AND GUITERREZ’S

PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; DEPUTY

SHERIFF CHAD FICKETT (0277);

[Doc. No. 22.]

SERGEANT JOSEPH BARRY (4722);

DEPUTY SHERIFF ALEJANDRO

SILVA (0248); DEPUTY SHERIFF

MICHAEL CRUZ (5622); DEPUTY

SHERIFF DANIEL GUTIERREZ (7441); and DEPUTY SHERIFF CLAUDIA 19 VALENCIA (unknown), Defendants. 21 On October 19, 2021, Defendants Deputy Chad Fickett and Deputy Daniel Gutierrez (“the Deputy Defendants”) filed a partial motion to dismiss Plaintiff Joe M. Young’s complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. (Doc. No. 22.) On November 8, 2021, Plaintiff filed a response in opposition to the Deputy Defendants’ motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 24.) On November 15, 2021, the Deputy Defendants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.