Diaz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ISMAEL DIAZ, Case No.: 21cv526-DMS-LL

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

CAPITAL ONE, N.A.; CAPITAL ONE

FINANCIAL CORPORATION; and [ECF No. 29]

CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.,

16 Defendants.

Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration of this Court’s Order Denying Without Prejudice Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery Responses. ECF No. 29 (“Mot.”). Defendants filed a Response in Opposition. ECF No. 31 (“Opp.”). For the below reasons, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED. LEGAL STANDARD “A district court is vested with broad discretion to permit or deny discovery.” Laub v. U.S. Dep’t of Interior, 342 F.3d 1080, 1093 (9th Cir. 2003). Unless otherwise limited by court order, the scope of discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is as follows: Parties may obtain discovery …