Perez
Perez v. Bank of America, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIA PEREZ, Case No.: 21-cv-01977-JLS-MDD
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
v. PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S EX
PARTE MOTION FOR
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et al.,
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING
Defendants. ORDER
16 [ECF No. 3] 17 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Maria Perez’s Emergency Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Re Preliminary Injunction (“Ex Parte Motion” or “Motion”) (ECF No. 3). Plaintiff seeks a Court order restraining Defendants from instituting eviction proceedings or foreclosing on her property located at 752 Encanto Drive, Calexico, California, 92231. (ECF No. 3-1 at 9.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion without prejudice. LEGAL STANDARD Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b) governs the issuance of a temporary restraining order (“TRO”). The…