Doe
Doe v. Steele
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANE DOE, Case No.: 20cv1818-MMA (MSB)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
v. MOTION TO CONTINUE DATES IN
JULY 8, 2021 SCHEDULING ORDER
CISSY STEELE. et al.,
AND FIRST AMENDED
Defendants. SCHEDULING ORDER [ECF NO. 80] 16 17 On November 30, 2021, the parties filed a “Joint Motion to Continue Dates in the July 8, 2021 Scheduling Order Regulating Discovery and Other Pretrial Proceedings. (ECF No. 80.) Explaining simply that counsel for Defendant Steele has notified the other parties that his trial schedule for the next two months will make scheduling depositions nearly impossible, the parties request “a sixty (60) day extension of time for all discovery and other pre-trial dates in the Scheduling Order.” (Id. at 2.) In relation to other matters in this case, the Court has been informed by Defendant Steele’s counsel that he is actively engaged in a fraud trial in the Central District, which began…