Doe

Doe v. Steele

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20213:20-cv-01818California2,150 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANE DOE, Case No.: 20cv1818-MMA (MSB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING JOINT

v. MOTION TO CONTINUE DATES IN

JULY 8, 2021 SCHEDULING ORDER

CISSY STEELE. et al.,

AND FIRST AMENDED

Defendants. SCHEDULING ORDER [ECF NO. 80] 16 17 On November 30, 2021, the parties filed a “Joint Motion to Continue Dates in the July 8, 2021 Scheduling Order Regulating Discovery and Other Pretrial Proceedings. (ECF No. 80.) Explaining simply that counsel for Defendant Steele has notified the other parties that his trial schedule for the next two months will make scheduling depositions nearly impossible, the parties request “a sixty (60) day extension of time for all discovery and other pre-trial dates in the Scheduling Order.” (Id. at 2.) In relation to other matters in this case, the Court has been informed by Defendant Steele’s counsel that he is actively engaged in a fraud trial in the Central District, which began…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.