Diaz

Diaz v. Madden

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20213:20-cv-02147California5,207 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONIVAN DIAZ, Case No.: 20cv2147-GPC (BGS)

CDCR #AU-5079,

Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING SECOND vs. AMENDED COMPLAINT

WITHOUT FURTHER LEAVE TO

AMEND PURSUANT RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, TO 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) &

R. BUMGART, Litigation Coordinator, 1915A(b)(1)

N. TELLES, Litigation Coordinator, and

D. LOOP, Correctional Lieutenant,

18 Defendants. 19 20 On November 2, 2020, Plaintiff Donivan Diaz, a state prisoner incarcerated at Centinela State Prison (“Centinela”) in Imperial, California, filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff claimed that a Centinela Correctional Lieutenant, two Centinela Litigation Coordinators and the Warden of Centinela violated his federal constitutional rights to due process, access to the courts, and to be free from cruel and unusual punishment when they confiscated computer disks 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.