Diaz
Diaz v. Madden
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20213:20-cv-02147California5,207 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONIVAN DIAZ, Case No.: 20cv2147-GPC (BGS)
CDCR #AU-5079,
Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING SECOND vs. AMENDED COMPLAINT
WITHOUT FURTHER LEAVE TO
AMEND PURSUANT RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, TO 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) &
R. BUMGART, Litigation Coordinator, 1915A(b)(1)
N. TELLES, Litigation Coordinator, and
D. LOOP, Correctional Lieutenant,
18 Defendants. 19 20 On November 2, 2020, Plaintiff Donivan Diaz, a state prisoner incarcerated at Centinela State Prison (“Centinela”) in Imperial, California, filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff claimed that a Centinela Correctional Lieutenant, two Centinela Litigation Coordinators and the Warden of Centinela violated his federal constitutional rights to due process, access to the courts, and to be free from cruel and unusual punishment when they confiscated computer disks 27 …